Archive for the ‘Design’ Category

How changing a single sentence increased clicks by 173% (and why testing is so critical)

Friday, July 9th, 2010

Yup, that’s not a typo. 173%. And it underscores the importance of testing the copy, colours, images and layout you choose for your online efforts.

The 173% figure comes from an experiment carried out by Dustin Curtis, who played with the language that directed his website visitors to his Twitter account. He took his existing call to action: “I’m on Twitter” and played with the wording of the link, resulting in some extraordinary insights.

Dustin Curtis experiment

Dustin Curtis experiment

Through trial and error, he discovered that a move from “I’m on Twitter” to “You should follow me on Twitter here” resulted in the whopping increase in clicks. In his words:

As the forcefulness and personal identifiability of the phrase increased, the number of clicks likewise increased. “You” identifies the reader directly, “should” implies an obligation, and “follow me on twitter” is a direct command. Moving the link to a literal callout “here” provides a clear location for clicking. I tried other permutations that dulled the command, used the word “please” in place of “should” and made the whole sentence a link. None of them performed as well as the final sentence.

At the very least, the data show that users seem to have less control over their actions than they might think, and that web designers and developers have huge leeway for using language to nudge users through an experience.

Too often, we add words and images to something without a second thought about whether they are the right words and images. There’s only one way to find out, and that’s through testing. If the experiment above doesn’t convince you that it can be extremely worthwhile, then I don’t know what will.

Ask yourself: What are you trying to accomplish with your website or email campaign? Sign-ups? Click-throughs? Social media followers? Play with the variables around your particular call to action and see how a small change can score big results.

To get started, I’d highly recommend Smashing Magazine’s definitive guide to A/B Testing. It offers an excellent primer and practical advice, as well as top-notch tools, resources and examples, all in one spot. (It’s where I found this experiment.) Check out some of the other great case studies there too, like how 37 Signals increased sign-ups by 30% with a new headline or how Jason Thompson doubled the number of people contacting him by using his photo instead of a telephone icon.

gives you shivers

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

I won’t give it away by rambling on about how well done this is. Just watch this ad for Topsy – an AIDS Foundation.

Beautiful.

Found via I Believe in Advertising.

The death of the publishing industry?

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

This is such a great concept – beautifully executed and so simple. Be sure to watch it to the 1:15 mark to see what I mean.

TIme for the publishing industry to think differently about their audience to save itself. Great spot.

Ads we love: What a difference a pair of glasses makes

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Wonderfully simple ads for eyeglasses. Very clever.

pic_1200333491384

pic_12003334877549

pic_12003334956572

Found via What some would call lies.

Ads we love: March 5, 2010 – The Hulk

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Flexible fabric. Band-aid.

Picture 2

Gotta love the simplicity. Brilliantly gets the message across.

- via I believe in advertising.

Ads we love: February 25, 2010

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

The Kansas Food Bank has a great campaign out right now that uses partially obscured words on recognizable food product brands to drive home a social message:

food-bank-skip_thumb1

food-bank-snack_thumb1

food-bank-lucky_thumb1

Simple and powerful. Found via Dog and Pony Show.

on3′s top 10 posts of 2009

Monday, December 21st, 2009

on3 is a marketing and communications agency that specializes in promoting places, not products. This blog has become a place for us to take the best stuff from marketing and advertising and make it relevant to Canadian economic developers.

And 2009 has been QUITE the year for economic developers.

We’ve done our best to chronicle some of the challenges, showcase best practices and to examine what a tough economic climate means for marketing and communication design. Based on traffic, these are our most popular blog posts from 2009. Enjoy!

  1. How the Toronto Star lost my business for good… and what economic development marketers can learn from it.
  2. $75,000 for THAT?
  3. “Quality of life” becoming more important for relocation… but what does the term really mean?
  4. The role of ambassador programs in economic development marketing
  5. Tell the truth in city marketing
  6. Oh General Motors, you didn’t. Wait. You did.
  7. White Paper: Has branding become a dirty word?
  8. Eleven myths of economic development.
  9. Alberta rebrands itself
  10. Alberta branding campaign gets caught in a major blunder.

This blog will keep trying making sense of marketing and communication for economic developers in 2010. We hope you’ve enjoyed reading it as much as we’ve enjoyed writing it.

That purple mohawk looks good on you.

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

If the person in front of you was suddenly replaced by somebody completely different, would you notice? Well, in the case of this experiment on change blindness, 75% of participants failed to notice the switch. See for yourself:

So if we don’t even notice when one person suddenly turns into someone else, why are we so confident someone is going to notice our ads?

This little glimpse into human perception and behavior gives us all the more reason to make the investment in something that stands out. If Guy #2 had purple hair, I bet the 75% who failed to notice would have dropped to almost zero.

The lesson for marketing? Don’t settle for safe, average advertising. Instead, take a few risks and embrace the advertising equivalent of a purple mohawk. It’s the only way to get noticed.

Via Boing Boing.

How much of your website do your visitors see?

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Google has released a handy application that allows you to determine what users see at a glance when they first visit your site. This free tool is a good way to determine if your key information and call to action buttons are accessible to most users during their first impression of your site.

After you enter your site’s url, the Google tool shows an overlay of your site with screen resolutions in pixels along each axis and the corresponding average percentage of users viewing your site at these resolutions. Take a look at the tool in action on the City of Summerside’s website:

Picture 1

There is a great deal of debate about whether or not people are willing to scroll. Current thinking seems to be that users no longer mind scrolling vertically as much, but still loathe the horizontal scroll. I believe that people are willing to scroll (either way) if you give them a compelling reason to do so – i.e. “Does it appear that I will I find what I am looking for/interested in on this site?”. The Google Browser Size tool is helpful in determining how quickly someone will be able to answer this question, and can assist you in tweaking your site layout and design to increase the chances that someone will see the key stuff first and be compelled to delve deeper.

You can try it here. Found via Mashable.