Archive for the ‘Design’ Category

How much of your website do your visitors see?

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Google has released a handy application that allows you to determine what users see at a glance when they first visit your site. This free tool is a good way to determine if your key information and call to action buttons are accessible to most users during their first impression of your site.

After you enter your site’s url, the Google tool shows an overlay of your site with screen resolutions in pixels along each axis and the corresponding average percentage of users viewing your site at these resolutions. Take a look at the tool in action on the City of Summerside’s website:

Picture 1

There is a great deal of debate about whether or not people are willing to scroll. Current thinking seems to be that users no longer mind scrolling vertically as much, but still loathe the horizontal scroll. I believe that people are willing to scroll (either way) if you give them a compelling reason to do so – i.e. “Does it appear that I will I find what I am looking for/interested in on this site?”. The Google Browser Size tool is helpful in determining how quickly someone will be able to answer this question, and can assist you in tweaking your site layout and design to increase the chances that someone will see the key stuff first and be compelled to delve deeper.

You can try it here. Found via Mashable.

Safe, predictable, uninspired: The new Philadelphia identity doesn’t ring my bell.

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

Creating an identity for an entire city or region is a tough undertaking.

You are trying to please many different stakeholders. You’re trying to communicate many different messages, but with limited real estate to do so. And you are creating something that is sure to be scrutinized very closely by many, because they have a stake in their city’s brand, and often some concern about how much public money is being spent on marketing activities.

With all these challenges, it is very tempting to do something safe and easy, which is exactly the trap that Philadelphia fell into. In fact, this new logo serves up a lot of place branding “don’ts” in a single creative execution. We’ll discuss them below.

philadelphia_logo

1. DON’T rely on an icon.

Trying to select a single icon to represent a city or region is fraught with risk. For example, a mountain community that chooses a mountain icon has effectively done two things with that choice: 1) ensured that its logo looks like every other community that has mountains (because I’ll guarantee 90% of them also used a mountain icon), and 2) immediately created an image of the place that is pretty inflexible. If they want to promote themselves as a bustling mecca for technology, well… they’re screwed. Their reliance on that icon is sending the singular message that they’re a peaceful mountain community with streams and bunnies.

This is the problem with the bell icon here. Yes, Philadelphia is most known for the Libery Bell. But this icon, because it is so plain and literal, immediately makes a decision that this city is about its history and its famous landmarks. From an economic development perspective, that’s a big lost opportunity. Although font choice, colour and abstracted images also create a “feeling” about a place, they are much more open to interpretation, and can be more flexible in their application. If they wanted to leverage the recognition that comes from the Liberty Bell, the city should have at least employed a more abstract interpretation that perhaps “hints” at the bell, but also shows some creativity and interesting design.

2. DON’T phone in your tagline.

Life, liberty… and you? This tagline feels like an afterthought. Like the bell, it is safe, predictable and really says very little about the City of Philadelphia. In fact, I’m not really sure what it’s saying.

Writing a tagline for a city is a difficult task indeed. How do you sum it up in a single phrase? The answer lies in rejecting that ambition outright. There is no way to sum up everything a city stands for in a single phrase. You can focus on a primary goal or image you want to project and take a stand with a bold statement that reflects it. You can opt for multiple taglines that suit different situations. You can even forgo a tagline altogether and let the icon come alive in different applications where you can use more words, images and context to communicate what the city stands for.

But when you try to sum it all up in a single phrase, you are left with a tagline like “Life – Liberty – And You”. Almost as riveting as “Live, Work, Play”. A tagline counts. If you can’t find one that says something, it’s better not to say anything at all.

3. DON’T design by committee.

This logo was the result of consensus among 65 people. SIXTY FIVE members on this committee. No wonder it’s safe and doesn’t say anything. It’s unlikely that you’d be able to get 65 people to agree to anything else.

Don’t get me wrong. It’s critical to get input into a city logo, not only for the insight that comes from different perspectives but to encourage the buy-in that you will inevitably need to seek when it’s all said and done. But that input should not be in the form of “red vs. blue” or “lighthouse vs. seagull”. Trying to get a large committee to agree at this level of detail is a surefire way to ensure that everything different, creative and strong gets thrown out, because someone is bound to object. What is left on the table is the easy, wishy-washy stuff that nobody can find any real objection to. And then you choose from that pool.

Instead, get input at the “business challenge” level. What kind of message do we want to send out about our city? How do we want people to “feel” when they see our logo? What are our ambitions for this city’s future? Hand that info off to a professional creative agency and let them handle the colour choices and fonts in a way that best responds to the input your group has given.

4. DON’T believe that your logo IS your brand.

Most importantly, don’t get trapped by the idea that a single logo is your city’s brand. It’s not, and no logo can ever live up to this expectation. A brand is so much more than a mountain or a swoosh or a set of golden arches.

The Nike swoosh stands for commitment, sportsmanship and quality because of how they use it in their marketing efforts, and because of the experience they offer customers who buy their products. That little squiqqle is pretty meaningless without the full Nike context.

A logo is just a logo. Your brand is every piece of marketing, every media story, every facebook comment, every interaction that someone has with you. It is cumulative, and unlike colour or font, you cannot control it. You can only influence it by being true to your city’s goals and values and ensuring that you conduct your day-to-day business in a way that matches up with the promise of your logo and your marketing materials.

Once you relieve the pressure of trying to be all things to all people with a single image and tagline, you are on track to create something really interesting and memorable. Hopefully Philadelphia will get the message and give it another shot.

- Found via Brand New.

Great ads from Lego

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Beautifully executed.

legoairplane

legodinosaur

shiplego

legotenk

Found via This Blog Rules.

Place Branding Inspiration Gallery

Friday, September 25th, 2009

Over the last year, we’ve reviewed quite a few logos and re-branding efforts from cities and regions around the world. Here are 7 posts to get you thinking about your own visual identity and branding program:

  1. Copenhagen – A very innovative and flexible approach.
  2. Alberta – A bold, $25 million branding investment
  3. Raleigh - Trying to hard to be all things to all people?
  4. Belfast – A variety of taglines and colours give different stakeholders flexibility.
  5. Dayton – Interesting messaging falls down in design execution.
  6. Melbourne - Beautiful in full colour, breaks down in single-colour execution. Strong concept though.
  7. U.S. Virgin Islands - My personal favourite. Strong all around.

    Are homepages relevant anymore?

    Saturday, May 30th, 2009

    In an article over at UX Matters, Daniel Szuc provides some compelling food for thought about this very question. Do people really read the content on homepages anymore? Szuc argues (and we agree) that good homepage design should prioritize making the rest of the site content quickly and immediately accessible. And the stuff we used to save for the homepage – what the organization stands for, what it’s all about etc. – really needs to live on every page in some fashion.

    It’s a long article but a worthy read. Here are some great clips:

    When customers visit your home page, their attention span is limited. They are busy and want to find answers quickly. They don’t want unnecessary distractions and will immediately leave and go to another site if they cannot find what they want on your home page. They do not want to wade through marketing messages.

    In his article “Is Home Page Design Relevant Anymore?” Jared Spool of UIE pointed out that many users are bypassing the home page, going directly to whatever page satisfies their content need. So, it’s important for all your key landing pages to perform a similar role to the home page.

    For municipalities and regions, this challenge is particularly relevant. Users of these sites come for a myriad of reasons – to find site selection information, to pay a parking ticket, to look at the public skating schedule, to learn about hotels they can stay at when they visit. These sites must often serve residents, businesses, prospective residents and businesses, tourists and site selectors. No single page will speak to all these audiences. The key is to use this page to effectively help each person find what they are looking for quickly or they will move on just as quickly.

    Read the whole thing here.

    What makes a good “call to action”?

    Sunday, May 24th, 2009

    A call to action is what we want our audience to answer right? It’s that thing that spurs them to “click”, “call” or leap from their lazy boy and do what that television commercial just suggested. But what makes an effective call to action? Why do we need to start thinking beyond just the usual “contact us for more info”?

    Hubspot offers 7 tips for more effective calls to action and they definitely got us thinking. We’ve been pondering this for awhile now. When it comes to economic development and tourism, the “call” has to be pretty compelling. We’re not asking someone to order a pizza, we’re asking them to come to a community at least for a visit, if not for a complete life change. That call better be good!

    Here are some of the tips we think particularly apply for economic development:

    Indicate a Specific Action

    Make your call to action as specific as possible. Tell the user exactly what you want them to do and how. Avoid vague generalities and instead tell them to click, sign up, contact us or download.

    (more…)